Understanding the Experience of Hospital Pharmacists with the Effectiveness, Safety, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and Interchangeability of Biopharmaceutical Medicines

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31351/vol31iss1pp72-86

Keywords:

Biological medicines, biosimilar medicines, biopharmaceutical medicines, effectiveness, safety, interchangeability, hospital pharmacists, perceptions, qualitative study, Iraq

Abstract

The study objectives were to 1) explore the real-world experience of hospital pharmacists with the differences in effectiveness safety, and interchangeability between biosimilar medicines and their reference biological counterparts, 2) reveal pharmacist recommendations to enhance the safety of biopharmaceutical medicines in public hospitals.

The study has a mixed-method design where the core component was qualitative (interviews) and the supplemental component was quantitative (adverse drug reaction, ADR, reports). This qualitative component included semi-structured (mostly face-to-face) interviews involving hospital pharmacists from different hospitals with experience with biological or biosimilar medicines. The interviews were conducted from Nov 2020 through Feb 2021. Thematic analyses were used to analyze qualitative data generated from the interviews.

The study sample included 25 pharmacists from ten governmental hospitals in Baghdad, Iraq. The pharmacists were 21 women and 4 men. Because most pharmacists had a short experience with biosimilar medications, they were unsure about their effectiveness and safety. Most pharmacists preferred reference biological over biosimilar medicines because of their effectiveness.  However, they believed that initial prescribing and switching between a reference and counterpart biosimilar rely on their availability. The pharmacists tended to underreport biopharmaceutical ADRs.

The non-sustainable supply of the same biopharmaceutical medicines in public hospitals negatively impacted pharmacist evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of biosimilar medicines. Both pharmacist interviews and the Iraqi Pharmacovigilance Center (IqPhvC) data showed under-reporting of biopharmaceutical ADRs. Medicine procurement in healthcare settings should focus on sustainably securing high-quality biopharmaceuticals rather than looking only at costs to enhance patient clinical outcomes.  Providing pharmacist training, electronic reporting, promoting documentation, and following up with patients is pivotal to prevent, monitor and treat their ADRs.

Author Biography

  • Hiba Leith Fahmi, University of Baghdad College of Pharmacy

    Master student at Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Iraq

How to Cite

1.
Al-Jumaili AA, Fahmi HL. Understanding the Experience of Hospital Pharmacists with the Effectiveness, Safety, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and Interchangeability of Biopharmaceutical Medicines. Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences [Internet]. 2022 Jun. 12 [cited 2024 Dec. 28];31(1):72-86. Available from: https://bijps.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/bijps/article/view/1441

Publication Dates

References

Ebrahim GJ. Pharmaceutical biotechnology: concepts and application Gary Walsh (ed). Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2008;54(3):214-.

Santos SB, Sousa Lobo JM, Silva AC. Biosimilar medicines used for cancer therapy in Europe: a review. Drug discovery today. 2019;24(1):293-9.

Declerck P, Danesi R, Petersel D, Jacobs I. The Language of Biosimilars: Clarification, Definitions, and Regulatory Aspects. Drugs. 2017;77(6):671-7.

Biosimilar and Interchangeable Products [Internet]. US Food and Drug Administartion 2017 [cited April 24, 2021].

O'Callaghan J, Griffin BT, Morris JM, Bermingham M. Knowledge of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and the Pharmacovigilance of Biological Medicines: A Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Ireland. BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy. 2018;32(3):267-80.

Giuliani R, Tabernero J, Cardoso F, McGregor KH, Vyas M, de Vries EGE. Knowledge and use of biosimilars in oncology: a survey by the European Society for Medical Oncology. ESMO open. 2019;4(2):e000460.

Karateev D, Belokoneva N. Evaluation of Physicians' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Biosimilars in Russia and Issues Associated with Their Prescribing. Biomolecules. 2019;9(2).

Global Biologics Market [Internet]. 2020 [cited July 17, 2021]. Available from: https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/biologics-market.

McCamish M, Woollett G. Worldwide experience with biosimilar development. mAbs. 2011;3(2):209-17.

Al-Kinani KK, Ibrahim MJ, Al-Zubaidi RF, Younus MM, Ramadhan SH, Kadhim HJ, et al. Iraqi regulatory authority current system and experience with biosimilars. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2020;117:104768.

de Mora F. Biosimilar: what it is not. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2015;80(5):949-56.

Dörner T, Strand V, Castañeda-Hernández G, Ferraccioli G, Isaacs JD, Kvien TK, et al. The role of biosimilars in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2013;72(3):322-8.

Weise M, Bielsky MC, De Smet K, Ehmann F, Ekman N, Giezen TJ, et al. Biosimilars: what clinicians should know. Blood. 2012;120(26):5111-7.

Gregory GP, Carrington C, Cheah CY, Hawkes EA, Irving IM, Siderov J, et al. A consensus statement on the use of biosimilar medicines in hematology in Australia. Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology. 2020;16(4):211-21.

Schoonenboom J, Johnson RB. How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2017;69(Suppl 2):107-31.

Weller SC, Vickers B, Bernard HR, Blackburn AM, Borgatti S, Gravlee CC, et al. Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198606.

Clark JWCaVLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd Edition ed. USA: SAGE; 2011. 301 p.

Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77-101.

Al-Jumaili AA. Iraq Pharmaceutical Country Profile 2020. In: Health Mo, editor. https://moh.gov.iq/upload/upfile/ar/1375.pdf: World Health Organization; 2020.

Health Mo. Annual Statistics Report 2019. In: Directorate P, editor. Baghdad: Iraqi Ministry of Health; 2020.

Al-Jumaili AA, Hussain SA, Sorofman B. Pharmacy in Iraq: history, current status, and future directions. American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. 2013;70(4):368-72.

Crespi-Lofton J, Skelton JB. The growing role of biologics and biosimilars in the United States: Perspectives from the APhA Biologics and Biosimilars Stakeholder Conference. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. 2017;57(5):e15-e27.

Machado-Alba JE, Jiménez-Morales AL, Moran-Yela YC, Parrado-Fajardo IY, Valladales-Restrepo LF. Adverse drug reactions associated with the use of biological agents. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0240276.

de Camargo MC, Barros BCA, Fulone I, Silva MT, Silveira M, de Camargo IA, et al. Adverse Events in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Long-Term Biological Agents in a Real-Life Setting. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2019;10:965.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-12